USPTO serial 78089597
REGENER-8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGENER-8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Petersburg, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelley
SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY BAUERSFELD LOWRY & KELLEY, LLP6320 CANOGA AVESTE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ADDITIVE INGREDIENTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURING OF BODY AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED ANTI-WRINKLE TREATMENTS, CREAMS, MOISTURIZERS, NIGHT CREAMS AND LOTIONS, FACIAL CLEANSERS, SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN EXFOLIATORS, FACE MASKS, HAND MASKS, BODY MASKS, BODY LOTION, BODY BATH GEL, BATH OILS, BODY OILS, CREAMS AND LOTIONS FOR CELLULITE REDUCTION, BODY CREAMS AND LOTIONS FOR MINIMIZINGTHE APPEARANCE OF STRETCH MARKS AND SKIN SCARRING; SUN TAN FORMULATIONS, NAMELY GELS, LOTIONS, AND OILS; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER; HAIR STYLING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, HAIR VOLUMIZING GELS AND HAIR SPRAYS; AND NON-MEDICATED SCALP TREATMENT CREAMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |