USPTO serial 78089801
POWERPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWERPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE A. SWAIN
RICHARD P STITT ETSHUGHART THOMSON & KILROY PCTWELVE WYANDOTTE PLZ 120 W 12TH STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software marketed and sold exclusively to banks and other financial institutions that permits their customers to pay their bills over the Internet. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |