Drawing for SAFETYWATCH

USPTO serial 78089981

SAFETYWATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFETYWATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for othersACTIVEJul 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 9, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance