Drawing for AMAXIO

USPTO serial 78090130

AMAXIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMAXIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

Mark I. Peroff Hiscock & Barclay, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of respiratory diseases and disorders, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of gastro-intestinal diseases and disordersACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 1, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Jul 1, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Jul 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIPโ€”
Jan 3, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 3, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Jan 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Jun 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 9, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Dec 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Dec 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jul 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jun 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Jun 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Jun 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jun 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Dec 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Dec 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Apr 7, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILEDโ€”
Mar 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Mar 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Sep 23, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Sep 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Sep 4, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance