Drawing for NAUYAK

USPTO serial 78090325

NAUYAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAUYAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food products, namely, meat, fish, poultry, seafood, dairy based beverages, vegetables, fruits, shelled nuts and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 11, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 11, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 20, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jul 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 200344DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Feb 26, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance