Drawing for ULTRAFLEX

USPTO serial 78090346

ULTRAFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ULTRAFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott F. Landis

Scott F. Landis Barley Snyder126 East King StreetLancaster, PA 17602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL DEVICES; NAMELY, INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON CATHETERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 26, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 26, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 13, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance