USPTO serial 78090426
FUTURENOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURENOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristine M. Miller
KRISTINE M MILLER HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200P O BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED DISKS, DISKETTES, CD-ROMS, AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTES, EACH ON THE SUBJECTS OF MONEY, FINANCIAL PLANNING, AND INVESTING | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATERIALS NAMELY, BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, WORKBOOKS, USER GUIDES, PERIODICALS AND ARTICLES, EACH ON THE SUBJECT OF MONEY, FINANCIAL PLANNING, AND INVESTING | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT CONSULTING; FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT ADVICE NAMELY, EDUCATIONAL SERVICES AND TRAINING SERVICES NAMELY CONDUCTING SEMINARS AND PRESENTATIONS IN THE FIELDS OF INVESTMENT, PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SUCCESS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |