USPTO serial 78090480
EDISON'S CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDISON'S CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH H. TADDEO
JOSEPH H TADDEOPO BOX 22720 ONE CHAGRIN HGHLDSCLEVELAND, OH 44122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | fluorescent electric light bulbs that retrofit in standard incandescent sockets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |