USPTO serial 78090508
RED HOT GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED HOT GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
El Monte, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's and Children's Clothing, namely, shorts, pants, trousers, jeans, skirts, overalls, dresses, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, woven and knit shirts, vests, blouses, sweaters; Outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, and capes; Footwear, namely, women's and children's shoes, sandals and boots; Headwear, namely, hats, caps, and sun visors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |