USPTO serial 78090509
LIGHTPHARMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIGHTPHARMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi A. Schiller
HEIDI A SCHILLER197 ELM ST STE 1730NORTHAMPTON, MA 01060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BIOLOGICAL, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS UTILIZING PROCESS ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INCORPORATING COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY LIGHT INDUCED FLUORESCENCE SENSORS, NEAR INFRARED SENSORS, RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY SENSORS, CHEMUMETRICS SENSORS, HPLC LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY INSTRUMENT, MID INFRARED SENSORS, PARTICLE SIZE ANALYZERS, ULTRA VIOLET SENSORS, ABSORBENCE SENSORS, IMAGE ANALYSIS SENSORS, MASS SPECTROMETRY SENSORS, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SENSORS, ALL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURING AND TESTING PROCESSES, PRODUCT AND PRODUCT DATA, FOR THE PURPOSES OF ENSURING THE QUALITY OF SUCH PROCESSES, PRODUCTS AND ENSURING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |