USPTO serial 78090686
MATRIX VSG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MATRIX VSG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David T. Burse
DAVID T BURSE BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO STE 1800SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | HEMOSTASIS COMPOSITIONS FOR SEALING VASCULAR PUNCTURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCESS CLOSURE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Confluent Surgical, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Confluent Surgical, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MATRIX VSG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |