USPTO serial 78091197
UNISEXY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNISEXY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc A. Hubbard
MARC A HUBBARD MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, PC1445 ROSS AVE STE 4000DALLAS, TX 75202-2790UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toiletries, namely antiperspirants, deodorants, talcum powder; skin-care preparations; cleansers, namely, skin cleansers, facial cleansers, facial scrubs, body scrubs; moisturizers, namely, skin moisturizers, facial moisturizers, body moisturizers; aftershave; shaving stones; after-shaving preparations; shaving preparations; shaving oil; shaving gel; shaving foam; shaving soaps; soaps; perfumery, namely, fragrances, cologne, toilet water, perfume; hair-care preparations and products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, styling gel, mousse, hair spray and hair oil; dentifrices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |