USPTO serial 78091279
AVATAR LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SLIE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AVATAR LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scotts Valley, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software for use in creating avatars to use in virtual world settings | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |