Drawing for LANDS' END DIRECT MERCHANTS

USPTO serial 78091367

LANDS' END DIRECT MERCHANTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LANDS' END DIRECT MERCHANTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely shirts, pants, jackets, sweaters, shoes, pajamas, robes and undergarmentsACTIVEAug 1, 2001
035MAIL ORDER, RETAIL AND COMPUTERIZED ONLINE ORDERING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL MERCHANDISE, RETAIL DEPARTMENT STORES AND RETAIL ONLINE DEPARTMENT STORESACTIVEAug 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance