USPTO serial 78091429
ITRAVEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ITRAVEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOLUTIONS LIMITED
GODAMLING SURREY, GB
Other trademarks owned by SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOLUTIONS LIMITED
SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
GODAMLING SURREY, GB
Other trademarks owned by SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
GODAMLING SURREY, GB
Other trademarks owned by SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
GODAMLING SURREY, GB
Other trademarks owned by SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
Equant Application Services Limited
Surrey, GB
Other trademarks owned by Equant Application Services Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR APPLICATION AND DATABASE INTEGRATION, FOR CONNECTING GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, [ FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, ] FOR BUSINESS PROCESS AUTOMATION, AND FOR FACILITATING, DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL USE; [ AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS AND PUBLICATIONS IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT SOLD TOGETHER THEREWITH AS A UNIT ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; [ CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF COMPUTERS; ] CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER [ HARDWARE AND ] SOFTWARE; APPLICATION SOFTWARE INSTALLATION SERVICES; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, NAMELY, MONITORING OF NETWORK SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOLUTIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOULTIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Equant Application Services Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ITRAVEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |