Drawing for ITRAVELBUSINESS

USPTO serial 78091500

ITRAVELBUSINESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITRAVELBUSINESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Michael Faier

JAMES MICHAEL FAIER FAIER & FAIER PC566 W ADAMS STSTE 600CHICAGO, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in database management, and for facilitating, developing and implementing electronic commerce transactions, all in the field of general use; and instruction manuals and publications in electronic format sold together therewith as a unitACTIVE—
042Computer programming for others; computer systems analysis; technical research in the field of computer programming; consultancy services relating to the design and installation of computers; consultancy services in the field of computer hardware and software; application software installation services; maintenance of computer software; and technical support, namely, monitoring of network systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 30, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 29, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 22, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 29, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
May 27, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 200244EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED—
Aug 5, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance