Drawing for COOKWARE FOR THE WAY YOU COOK EVERYDAY

USPTO serial 78091687

COOKWARE FOR THE WAY YOU COOK EVERYDAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOKWARE FOR THE WAY YOU COOK EVERYDAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Word

JEFFREY A WORD CONAIR CIP, INCONE CUMMINGS POINT RDSTAMFORD, CT 06904UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Non-electric stainless steel cookware, namely, sauce pans, skillets, saute pans, casseroles, saucepots, stockpots, steamers, double boilers, pasta inserts, tea kettles, dutch ovens, chef's pans, pressure cookers, stamer sets, stir fry pans, grand griddles, lasagna pans, roasters, colanders, butter warmers, au gratin pans, woks, sauteuse, bake pans, and round griddlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 14, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance