Drawing for SURGICRAFT STABILISATION SYSTEM (SSS)

USPTO serial 78091883

SURGICRAFT STABILISATION SYSTEM (SSS)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATERS-PEREZ,KATHYRN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURGICRAFT STABILISATION SYSTEM (SSS)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry C. Kane

BARRY C KANE MILLER, JOHNSON, SNELL & CUMMISKEY, PL250 MONROE AVE N W STE 800POST OFFICE BOX 306GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0306

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010BONE IMPLANTS, BRACES FOR LIMBS AND JOINTS, CERVICAL, SPINAL AND VERTEBRA FIXATION DEVICES, NAMELY, BONE SCREWS, PLATES, RODS, PINS, WIRE LOOPS AND RECTANGLES, AND CABLES, METALLIC AND POLYMERIC BONE IMPLANTS, MEDICAL BRACES FOR SPINE, ORTHOPEDIC BRACES, ORTHOPEDIC JOINT IMPLANTS, ORTHOPEDIC OR SURGICAL SPLINTS, SPINAL IMPLANTS, SPLINTS FOR SPINE, SUPPORTS FOR MEDICAL USE ALONG SPINE, AND SUPPORTS FOR SPINE FOR MEDICAL USEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance