Drawing for XYMPHONIC

USPTO serial 78091902

XYMPHONIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with XYMPHONIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Sullivan

DEAN R KARAU FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA4000 PILLSBURY CTR200 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY SOFTWARE TO ENABLE THE SHARING, COORDINATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTS, DATA, FILES, AND SOFTWARE AND TO ENABLE MULTIPLE-USER COLLABORATION AND CONCURRENT ACCESS, USE, AND OPERATIONS ON DOCUMENTS, DATA, FILES, AND SOFTWARE OVER A NETWORK OR OVER THE INTERNETACTIVE—
038ELECTRONIC COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSMISSION OF DATA, FILES, MESSAGES AND PICTURES; ELECTRONIC MAIL TRANSMISSION; ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS, VIA COMPUTER SERVER; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, MESSAGES AND FILESACTIVE—
041EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWAREACTIVE—
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE; UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 29, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance