Drawing for SONICAIR

USPTO serial 78092090

SONICAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONICAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERICH G RHYNHART

ERICH G RHYNHART PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP14 OAK PARKBEDFORD, MA 01730UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely providing instruction in the use of computer softwareACTIVE
042Technical support services, namely troubleshooting of computer software, maintenance of computer software, and consulting services in the field of computer softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Nov 30, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 12, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2002GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance