USPTO serial 78092374
LORD OF THE GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LORD OF THE GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Wares: 1) Electronic amusement apparatus such as elctronic game equipment for playing video games; player operated controllers, steering wheels and joysticks for electronic video game machines and computers; toy guns interactive with video game display; video game components; expansion memory cards for electronic game equipment for playing video games; attachments to electronic controllers and joysticks for video game machines and computers to import sensory feedback; peripheral devices for use with video game machines and computers; attachments to computer game equipment containing memory devices for hand-held video game machines with memory for storing game programs; cables for interactive play between hand-held video game devices; accessories for hand-held video game devices; namely lights, adapters, battery packs, flashing link cables, carrying cases; karioke machine attachments, namely microphones and headsets. 2} Electronic game programs, software, cartridges, video game cartridges and video game software; karioke game machines. Services: Importing, exporting, consultation and advising in relationship to retail promotion and merchandising; performing market research and analysis; inventory control; provision, installation and maintenance of in-store signs, mobiles, counter cards, window banners, shelving, displays, racks, floor and counter organizers, drawer units, display cabinets and carousels, video tapes, demonstration video games and accessories, education of others with respect to promotion and merchandising techniques. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |