USPTO serial 78092569
POOLBUSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2809325Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POOLBUSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EAST BRUNSWICK, NJ
New York City, NY
New York City, NY
New York City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN M NIPPER
JEFFREY A SCHWAB ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Swimming pool cleaners, in the nature of a vacuum-type unit | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Sep 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WATER TECH LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Poseidon Pool Cleaners, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Poseidon Pool Cleaners, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Poseidon Pool Cleaners, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named POOLBUSTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2006 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |