USPTO serial 78092598
ONEDIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONEDIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Nessary
JOHN C CAIN WONG CABELLO20333 SH 249, STE 600HOUSTON, TX 77070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATION HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR TELECONFERENCE AND VIDEO CONFERENCE CALL MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING AND MANAGING VOICE, VIDEO, AND DATA TRAFFIC OVER ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINES (DSL), AND OTHER HIGH BANDWIDTH LINES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TELECONFERENCING AND VIDEO CONFERENCING; TELECONFERENCING AND VIDEO CONFERENCING HARDWARE; COMPUTER HARDWARE; TELEPHONES, VIDEO MONITORS AND VIDEO CAMERAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; TELECONFERENCING AND VIDEO CONFERENCING SERVICES; PROVIDING SERVICES THAT SIMPLIFY TELECONFERENCING AND VIDEO CONFERENCING, NAMELY AUTOMATION OF CALL INITIATION, ROUTING, NETWORK CHOICES AND CONNECTIONS BETWEEN TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |