USPTO serial 78092715
ARYLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARYLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara J. Grahn
BARBARA J GRAHN OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP45 S 7TH ST STE 3300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for use in industry, namely, fluorine polyester monomers and polymers thereof for use in manufacturing in the optical, electric electronic, photographic, graphics, imaging, packaging, insulating, adhesive and magnetic tape industries; plastic molding compounds for the manufacture of printed and sintered plastic goods, unexposed photographic films | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Scientific, electric and optical apparatus and instruments and parts thereof, namely, liquid crystal displays and parts thereof, capacitors and parts thereof, printed circuits and parts thereof; optical lenses for use in optical, electric, electronic, photographic, graphic and imaging apparatus; optical products, namely, discs, filters, mirrors, fibers, sold as a component of fiber optic cables; cables sold as a component of optoelectric connectors; separating membranes and filters for removing particles from fluids; batteries and components thereof; sensor cards for detecting environmental chemical compounds | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | Plastic goods for commercial and industrial use, namely, flexible films deriving from fluorine polyester polymers for use in manufacturing flexible plastic products, fur use in the industrial and commercial packing and insulating industries, and for use in the manufacture of adhesive and magnetic tapes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ferrania S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FERRANIA TECHNOLOGIES S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FERRANIA TECHNOLOGIES S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named ARYLITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |