USPTO serial 78092847
K-9 HEROES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3259077Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2007
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with K-9 HEROES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Plastic character toys; plush toys; soft sculpture plush toys; stuffed toys; talking toys; dog toys; electronic action toys; fantasy character toys; mechanical toys; pet toys; mechanical and electrical action toys; battery operated action toys; bendable toys; wind-up toys wind up walking toys; stuffed toy animals; stuffed toy bears; children's multiple activity toys non-riding transportation toys; mechanical action toys; inflatable toys; rubber character toys; push toys; squeezable squeaking toys inflatable toys showing decorative pictures; inflatable ride-on toys | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |