Drawing for THE LONESTAR OF FOOTBALL

USPTO serial 78092989

THE LONESTAR OF FOOTBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LONESTAR OF FOOTBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin G. Smith

KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVEWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL GAMES AND EXHIBITIONS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT SPORTS AND FOOTBALL ENTERTAINMENT VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK AND/OR THE INTERNET; FAN CLUBS; ORGANIZING SPORTING EVENTS; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF LIVE THEATRICAL, MUSICAL AND MULTIMEDIA PERFORMANCES AND SHOWS DURING PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL GAMES AND OTHER SPORTING EVENTS; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS; PRODUCTION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 15, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 31, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance