USPTO serial 78092990
BUSINESS WIRE CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUSINESS WIRE CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly G. Russell
KIMBERLY G RUSSELL STEINHART & FALCONER LLP333 MARKET ST STE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic newsletter, press releases and news releases | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter in the form of newsletters, press releases and news releases | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of messages and images, data and documents via computer terminals, the Internet, satellite and wireless transmission; electronic mail; facsimile transmissions | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publication of newsletters, new releases and press releases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | News and press release wire services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Business Wire
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BUSINESS WIRE CONNECT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |