USPTO serial 78092993
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Richmond Hill Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Repper
GEORGE R REPPER ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K ST NWSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Non-steroidal and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cholinolytes, tranquilizers, anesthetics, antibiotics, antifungal agents, vitamins, hormones, plant extracts, CA-blockers, immunosuppressants, antineoplastics, and peptides, for treatment of pain, depression, infections, or for oral hygiene for patients and delivered via transdermal patches, oral medications, and topical preparation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 2004 |
| 010 | Drug delivery systems, namely colloidal lipid dispersion systems for transdermal drug delivery and self-emulsifying controlled release tablets for oral drug delivery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |