USPTO serial 78093614
LOADSHARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOADSHARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Sileo, Jr.
MICHAEL A SILEO JR MICROSEMI CORPORATION740 E CAMPBELL RD STE 900RICHARDSON, TX 75081UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductor devices for high-power switching | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |