CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MISSING A RIB, XY INSTEAD OF XX

USPTO serial 78093634

MISSING A RIB, XY INSTEAD OF XX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISSING A RIB, XY INSTEAD OF XX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Books, brochures, facsimile transmission paper, newsletters, pamphlets featuring content regarding scientific creationism and/or biblical inerrancy as interpreted via virtue of methodologies from the topic of computer scienceACTIVEJan 5, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 6, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 8, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 3, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 6, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 6, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 3, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 6, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 6, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 5, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 7, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 5, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 6, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 6, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 3, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 5, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 5, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 5, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 5, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 9, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 5, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 3, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 3, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 3, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 3, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 3, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 3, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 6, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 6, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 9, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 5, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 5, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 5, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 23, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 3, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 3, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 5, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 5, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 9, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 7, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 7, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 7, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 6, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 7, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 5, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 8, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 5, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 14, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 6, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 17, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 5, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 19, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 9, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 11, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 27, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 17, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 6, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 16, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 12, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 13, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 16, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 7, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 8, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 11, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 6, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 8, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 30, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2007CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 16, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2006SSFRSOU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 13, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 24, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 24, 2005CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
May 10, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 17, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 17, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 16, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 28, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 19, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 15, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 15, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance