USPTO serial 78094061
MED3D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MED3D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Heidelberg, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, sensors and processing hardware used in the field of medically measured data and image data for visualization, simulation, surgery assistance and the carrying out of surgery as well as for controlling medical instruments, namely X-ray-detectors,Computertomographic Scanners (CAT-Scan), Magnet resonance tomographic Scanners(MR), three dimensional-Digitizer-Scanners, optical cameras and probe heads, and related software, for acquiring, recording, transmission or reproduction of anatomical data in two dimensions and three dimensions | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical and dental planning and simulation systems comprised of display monitor and processing computer, medical navigation systems comprised of three dimension position sensor, display monitor and processing computer, medical robots for use in surgery; computer controlled or guided surgical tools, namely drills, saws,electrical surgical knives, and probes; control units comprising of processing computer and three dimension position sensor for surgical tools, namely for drills, saws, electrical surgical knives, and probes, Drilling machines and robots for manufacturing surgical templates, artificial limbs, prosthetics or replacement of teeth for use by medical technicians, surgical apparatus, namely, fixtures, clamps, registration markers and drill tubes for use in computer assisted surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications, especially via the Internet, in a medical context and for medical applications, namely, computer aided transmission of patient data, audio and video teleconferencing between medical professionals and/or patients and provision of access to patient information data or documents stored electronically in central files for remote consultation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others in the field of medically measured data and image data for visualization, simulation, surgery assistance and the carrying out of surgery, as well as for controlling medical instruments; scientific and medical industry research | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |