USPTO serial 78094112
TETE DE MOINE SWITZERLAND AOC WWW.TETDEMOINE.CH FROMAGE DE BELLELAY SCHNITTKASE, MINDESTENS 51% FETTI. TR., AUS ROHMILCH, HALBHART/MIA. 51% MG/ES, AU LAIT CRU, PATE MI-DURE / MIN. 51% FAT IN DRY MATTER, FROM RAW MILK, MAX. 40% MOISTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3165821Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2006
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TETE DE MOINE SWITZERLAND AOC WWW.TETDEMOINE.CH FROMAGE DE BELLELAY SCHNITTKASE, MINDESTENS 51% FETTI. TR., AUS ROHMILCH, HALBHART/MIA. 51% MG/ES, AU LAIT CRU, PATE MI-DURE / MIN. 51% FAT IN DRY MATTER, FROM RAW MILK, MAX. 40% MOISTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
Bern, CH
Other trademarks owned by Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
Bern, CH
Other trademarks owned by Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
Bern, CH
Other trademarks owned by Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG OUTH80 S HIGHLAND AVE TOWN OF OSSINIOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
- Other trademarks owned by Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
- Other trademarks owned by Vereinigung der Tête de Moine (Bellelay)-Käsefabrikanten, VTF
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named TETE DE MOINE SWITZERLAND AOC WWW.TETDEMOINE.CH FROMAGE DE BELLELAY SCHNITTKASE, MINDESTENS 51% FETTI. TR., AUS ROHMILCH, HALBHART/MIA. 51% MG/ES, AU LAIT CRU, PATE MI-DURE / MIN. 51% FAT IN DRY MATTER, FROM RAW MILK, MAX. 40% MOISTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |