USPTO serial 78094268
NAKED DIAMONDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2929555Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 2005
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NAKED DIAMONDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony S. Cannatella, Esq.
ANTHONY S CANNATELLA ESQ PAVIA & HARCOURT LLP600 MADISON AVE12TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | DIAMOND JEWELRY, NAMELY, EARRINGS, RINGS, BRACELETS, NECKLACES, PINS, AND VARIOUS OTHER JEWELRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |