USPTO serial 78094303
BEEFREEWAY BUSINESS E-EDUCATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEEFREEWAY BUSINESS E-EDUCATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss, Esq.
LISA M DUROSS ESQ HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC5445 CORPORATE DRSTE 400TROY, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded interactive, multi-media, namely, software for distance learning at the primary, high school and college level education and beyond in the fields of administrative support, business law, customer service, e-business, finance, financial services, human resources, industry foundations, knowledge management, operations, sales, strategic planning, communication, leadership, management, personal development, project management, team building, computing, information technology, networking, communications, internet and intranet and for accessing the distance learning site; down-loadable software for distance learning at the primary, high school and college education and beyond in the fields of administrative support, business law, customer service, e-business, finance, financial services, human resources, industry foundations, knowledge management, operations, sales, strategic planning, communication, leadership, management, personal development, project management, team building, computing, information technology, networking, communications, internet and intranet and for accessing the distance learning site | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2001 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the primary, secondary and university levels and distributing course material in connection therewith; distance learning services, namely, providing live and showing pre-recorded interactive multimedia at the primary, high school and college level education and beyond and training programs in the field of a variety of subjects via the world wide web and other communication networks and conducting distance learning workshops, seminars, and conferences for others in the field of primary and high school level course work and college level course work and beyond via communication networks | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2001 |
| 042 | Providing career guidance information via the world wide web and other communication networks; providing temporary use of down-loadable software for training and educating purposes at the primary, high school, college level and beyond, via global computer networks | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Michigan Virtual University
- Other trademarks owned by Michigan Virtual University
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BEEFREEWAY BUSINESS E-EDUCATION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |