USPTO serial 78094611
THE ORIGINAL HOT HOT HOT DONUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL HOT HOT HOT DONUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. French
TIMOTHY A FRENCH FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3200BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ice cream, ice cream cones, ice cream drinks, doughnuts, doughnut mixes, pudding, pudding mixes, pastries, pastry mixes, danish, danish mixes, bagels, bagel mixes, muffins, muffin mixes, pies, pie mixes, cakes, cake mixes, brownies, brownie mixes, cookies, cookie mixes, icing, icing mixes, coffee, coffee beans, tea, iced tea, espresso, espresso drinks, frozen yogurt, candy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |