USPTO serial 78094846
TUNHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUNHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sacramento, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tomato paste, Tomato powder, tomato juice, tomato ketchup, dehydrate tomato, lycopene and all tomato products | ACTIVE | Sep 18, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |