Drawing for GINGER BERGAMOT

USPTO serial 78094966

GINGER BERGAMOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2667447Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 24, 2002
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with GINGER BERGAMOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Quigley

Joseph Quigley LBrands, Inc.666 5th Avenue, 5th FloorNew York, NY 10103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Scented room fragrancing spraysSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
004CandlesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2009C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 4, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 26, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 21, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 20, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 23, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance