USPTO serial 78094972
COSMETIC CORRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COSMETIC CORRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM C. HELGASON
WILLIAM C HELGASON CLARK WILSON LLP800-885 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER, BC V6C 3H1CANADAGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |