Drawing for PAHLMANITE

USPTO serial 78095114

PAHLMANITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAHLMANITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DEAN R KARAU

DEAN R KARAU FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA4000 PILLSBURY CTR200 SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Compounds in the nature of chemical sorbents used for the removal and capture of pollutants; chemical compounds obtained from the processing of chemical sorbents used for the removal of pollutants from waste, industrial and combustion gasesACTIVE—
011Pollution control and removal units and scrubbers in the field of environmental control, and waste stream reductionACTIVE—
042Consulting in the field of pollution and environmental control, waste stream reduction, and generation of useful, marketable products from pollutants removed from waste, industrial, and combustion gasesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance