USPTO serial 78095734
STILA STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STILA STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra P. Thompson, PhD
SANDRA P THOMPSON, PHD BUCHALTER NEMER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORAT18400 VON KARMAN AVE STE 800IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, namely after shave, cologne, eau de parfum, eau de toilette, essential oils for personal use, fragranced body creams, gels and lotions and perfume; Cosmetics; Toiletries, namely anti-perspirant/deodorants, bath grains, bath oils, bath powders, non-medicated bath salts, body cleansers, body creams, body exfoliating preparations, body lotions, body oils, body powders, body scrubs, body toners, body washes, cleansing lotions, cleansing creams, cleansing gels, eye creams, eye gels, eye makeup removers, face creams, face gels, face lotions, face masks, facial cleansers, facial emulsions, facial exfoliating preparations, facial makeup removers, facial moisturizers, facial soaps, facial toners, hair conditioners, hair makeup, hair mascaras, hair mousses, hair revitalizing treatments, hair shampoos, hair sprays, hair straigheners, hair styling gels, hair sunscreens, hair thickeners, hand creams, non-medicated anti-wrinkle creams, lotions and gels, non-medicated facial skin oil controllers, non-medicated skin blemish preparations, non-medicated skin renewal creams, non-medicated skin repair creams, lotions and gels, personal soaps, non-medicated salt scrubs for the skin, shaving foams, creams, lotions and gels, skin balancing lotion, skin bronzing creams, lotions and gels, skin firming preparations, skin brighteners, skin lighteners, skin refreshers, sunless tanning preparations, sunscreens for the body, sunscreens for the face and after-sun soothing and moisturizing preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |