USPTO serial 78095799
DUNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward H. Rosenthal
EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT GARBUS KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ, PC488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and toys, namely action skill games, board games, equipment for role-play games sold as a unit, hand held units for playing video games, stuffed toys, plush toys, dolls, playsets for dolls, puppets, toy action figures and accessories therefor, toy action figure cases, flying discs, kites, bath toys, pool floats for recreational use, inflatable toys, toy cube puzzles and manipulative puzzles, jigsaw puzzles, yo-yos, pull toys, bean bags, infant rattles, jack-in-the-box, toy musical instruments, balloons, toy building blocks; toy construction blocks and connecting links, sold separately and as kits for construction of toy houses, toy buildings, toy household furnishings, toy robots, toy doll figures and vehicular toys; toy scooters, toy vehicles, remote-control toy vehicles, children's multiple activity toys, baby multiple activity toys, infant rattles, infant toys, sport balls, toy banks, bath toys, inflatable bath toys; handheld units for playing electronic games, electronic educational game machines and video games; card games and equipment sold as a unit for card games; dice; mobiles for children; toy model airplanes; toy model train sets; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; indoor slumber play tents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |