USPTO serial 78095807
WHO'S THAT GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHO'S THAT GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Brown
MICHAEL J BROWN CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT & MOSLE LLP101 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10178-0061UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MAKEUP AND COSMETIC PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FACIAL MAKEUP, EYE MAKEUP AND FOUNDATION MAKEUP, COSMETIC PENCILS,ROUGE, MASKS, FOUNDATIONS, CONCEALERS, POWDER, BLUSHER,EYE SHADOWS, EYE LINERS, EYE PENCILS, MASCARA, LIPSTICKS, LIP BALM, LIP PENCILS, LIP GLOSS, PERFUME, COLOGNE, EAU DE TOILETTE, EAU DE PARFUM, DEODORANTS, ANTIPERSPIRANTS, PERSONAL DEODORANTS, SOAP, DEODORANT SOAP, SKIN SOAPS, TOILET SOAP, LIQUID SOAP, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONERS, BUBBLE BATH, BATH GEL, SHOWER GEL, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL POLISH, BODY LOTION, HAND CREAM, MOISTURIZERS, BODY POWDER, FACE POWDER, BATH POWDER, SKIN LOTIONS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 19, 2003 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |