USPTO serial 78095952
THE BIG E-Z
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE BIG E-Z?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY, HOSIERY, SHOES, SNEAKERS, BOOTS, MOCCASINS, UNDERSHIRTS, BOXER SHORTS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, TROUSERS, PANTS, JACKETS, COATS, SUITS, BATHING SUITS, BATHROBES, SLIPPERS, SHORTS, TIES, NECKWEAR, SCARVES, SOCKS, HATS AND CAPS, GLOVES AND MUFFLERS, BELTS AND SUSPENDERS AND FOUL WEATHER GEAR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |