USPTO serial 78095975
ROME IN THE DESERT VALLEY AT THE STRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2828707Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROME IN THE DESERT VALLEY AT THE STRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
POMPANO BEACH, FL
POMPANO BEACH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Oltman
MILANIAN, CYRUS2070 S.E. 16TH STREETPOMPANO BEACH, FL 33062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT OF HOTELS, CASINOS, RESORTS, THEME PARKS, CONVENTION CENTERS, RESTAURANTS, SHOPPING MALLS, ENTERTAINMENT CENTERS AND PRODUCTS MERCHANDISING SERVICES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2005 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 28, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |