USPTO serial 78096119
IMPERATIVE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMPERATIVE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; designing and implementing network web pages for others; designing and implementing web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; integration of computer systems and networks; computer software design for others; up-dating of computer software; computer consultation; computer systems analysis; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; computer site design; computer disaster recovery planning; database development services; providing network services for others; providing online databases for others; computer programming for others; computer code conversion for others; data conversion of computer program data or information; data recovery services; computer diagnostic services; monitoring the computer systems of others and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; leasing computer facilities; Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; designing and implementing network web pages for others; designing and implementing web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; integration of computer systems and networks; computer software design for others; up-dating of computer software; computer consultation; computer systems analysis; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; computer site design; computer disaster recovery planning; database development services; providing network services for others; providing online databases for others; computer programming for others; computer code conversion for others; data conversion of computer program data or information; data recovery services; computer diagnostic services; monitoring the computer systems of others and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; leasing computer facilities | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |