Drawing for BLAZERS

USPTO serial 78097081

BLAZERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLAZERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anil V. George

ANIL V GEORGE NBA PROPERTIES, INC645 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely providing on-line magazines, newsletters, and coloring books in the field of basketball over the Internet, providing on-line catalogs featuring an array of basketball-theme products over the Internet; conducting public opinion poll surveys and public opinion poll surveys in the field of basketball for non-business, non-marketing purposes over the Internet; computer services, namely providing databases featuring general and local news and information of interest to specific geographic areas; providing databases of information, statistical information, trivia, and polling information over the Internet, providing access to interactive polling in the field of basketball over the Internet; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for gaining access to and for viewing television highlights, video recordings, video stream recordings, interactive video highlight selections, radio programs, radio highlights and audio recordings in the field of basketball over the Internet, video game programs, interactive video games, trivia games, action skill games, arcade games, adults` and children`s party games, trivia information games, board games, screensavers, wallpaper, browsers, skins, and cursorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 5, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 18, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 3, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance