USPTO serial 78097087
SUNSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Photochromic sensor patch for medical purposes that is applied to a person's skin that detects prolonged exposure to ultraviolet rays in order to help prevent overexposure and to indicate that more sunscreen should be applied by the user | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 3, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |