USPTO serial 78097278
STOEVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2005
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STOEVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Leon, Guanajuato, MX
Leon, Guanajuato, MX
Leon, Guanajuato, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 S FIRST ST 12TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Tanning oils for use in the manufacture of leather, oils for hardening leather, vetch used for tanning, epoxy putty for use in repairing leather shoes, glues for leather, epoxy putties for repairing leather, products for hardening leather, namely, sulphited oil, bi-sulphited oil, oxidized oils, raw oils, animal oils, synthetic oils, 2k polyurethane preparations, silicones, surfactants; products for manufacturing leather, namely, tanning agents, fillers, retanning agents, dispersants, surfactants, pigments, coating polymers, waxes, oils; waterproofing chemical compositions for leather, products for impregnation of leather during manufacturing, namely, silicon oils, acrylic resins, vinyl acetate; chemical products for refreshing leather during manufacture, tanning agents for use in the manufacture of leather, namely, chrome tanning, mimosa tanning agent, quebracho tanning agent, chestnut, aldehydes, sumac for use in tanning leather; products for hardening of leather during manufacture, namely, colloidal polymers, glucose, and goods for bleaching organic matter, namely, borax, acetic acid, formic acid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quimica Stoever, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Quimica Stoever, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Quimica Stoever, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named STOEVER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |