USPTO serial 78097506
L'IL PET HOSPITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L'IL PET HOSPITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Diettrich
ROBERT J DIETTRICH DAVIS, MALM & D'AGOSTINE PCONE BOSTON PLBOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, the production of a live action series with animated components for children which will be provided through broadcast Television, Cable Television, and/or broadcast radio | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kenn Viselman Presents, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kenn Viselman Presents, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KVIP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named L'IL PET HOSPITAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |