USPTO serial 78097567
PREFERRED ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREFERRED ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Preferred Hotels Association, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by Preferred Hotels Association, Inc.
PREFERRED HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by PREFERRED HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
PREFERRED HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by PREFERRED HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward G. Weirzbicki
EDWARD G WEIRZBICKI LOEB & LOEB LLPSuite 220010100 Santa Monica BlvdLos Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded CD-ROM's and computer diskettes featuring a database in the field of marketing. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Preferred Hotels Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PREFERRED HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PREFERRED HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PREFERRED ALLIANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |